Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford’s enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64-68.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.

Akerson, V.L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F.S. (2000). Improving pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science using a conceptual change teaching approach. International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Akron, Ohio.

Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.

Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2007). Bilimin doğasının sınıf öğretmeni adaylarına kütle çekim konusu içerisinde farklı yaklaşımlarla öğretilmesine yönelik bir çalışma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

Brush, S.G. (1989). History of science and science education. Interchange, 20(2), 60-70.

Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: a study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.

Clough, M.P. (2006). Learners' responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463-494.

Conant, J. (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science. Harvard University Press, Edition: 1, ISBN: 978-0674374003, 664 p.

Craft, J.L., & Miller, J.S. (2007). Unlocking the atom. Science Teacher, 74(2), 24-29.

Çelikdemir, M. (2006). Examining middle school students’ understanding of the nature of science. Unpublished master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Çil, E. (2010). Bilimin doğasının kavramsal değişim pedagojisi ve doğrudan yansıtıcı yaklaşım ile öğretilmesi: ışık ünitesi örneği. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Open University Press, Edition: 1, ISBN: 0-335-19381-1, 185 p.

Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and praticing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-133.

Gümüş, B.Ş. (2009). Bilimsel öykülerle fen ve teknoloji eğitiminin öğrencilerin fen tutumlarına ve bilim insanı imajlarına etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Güney B.G., & Şeker, H. (2012). Bilim kültürü ile empati kurulmasında bilim tarihinin kültürel araç olarak kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(1), 523-539.

Griffiths, A.K., & Barman, C.R. (1995). High school students’ views about the nature of science: results from three countries. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 248-255.

Griffiths, A.K., & Barry, M. (1993). High school students’ views about the NOS. School Science and Mathematics, 93(1), 35-37.

Holton, G., Rutherford, F.J., & Watson, F.G. (1970). The Project physics course. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Irwin, A.R. (2000). Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84, 5-26.

Kahraman, B. (2013). Genel kimya ders kitaplarında "kuantum sayıları" konusunun sunumu: bilim tarihi ve felsefesi açısından bir inceleme. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.

Kang, S., Scharman, L.C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: result from Korean 6th, 8th and 10th graders. Science Education, 89, 314-334.

Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus ımplicit ınquiry-oriented ınstruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.

Kılıç, F. (2010). Ortaöğretim kimya ders kitaplarında atom teorilerinin sunumunun bilim tarihi ve felsefesi açısından incelenmesi ve öğretmen görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Klopfer L.E., & Cooley W.W. (1963). The history science cases for high school in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 33-47.

Kuhn, T. (2008). Bilimsel devrimlerin yapısı. (Ç. Ed Kuyaş, N.). Ankara: Kırmızı Yayınları

Küçük, M. (2006). Bilimin doğasını ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerine öğretmeye yönelik bir çalışma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

Laçin Şimşek, C. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programları ve kitapları bilim tarihinden ne kadar ve nasıl yararlanıyor? İlköğretim Online Dergisi, 8(1), 129-145.

Langone, J., Stutz, B., & Giznopoulos, A. (2010). Sayıların icadından sicim teorisine bilimin 4000 yıllık resimli serüveni. (Ç. Ed. Akın, D.). İstanbul: NTV Yayınları.

Lederman, N.G. (1992). students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lin, H., & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers‟ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773-792.

Liu, S., & Lederman, N.G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114-123.

Matthews, MR. (1994). Science teaching: the role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge, Edition:

Marx, J., Mian, S. & Pagonis, V. (2004). Attitudes of undergraduate general science students toward learning science and the nature of science. Physics Education Research Conference, California State University, Sacramento.

McComas, W.F. (1996). Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10-16.

McComas, W.F. (2000). The Principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths (53-70), McComas, W.F. (Ed.) The Nature of Science in Science Education, Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

MEB (2012a). İlköğretim 7 Fen ve Teknoloji Ders Kitabı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.

MEB (2012b). İlköğretim 7 Fen ve Teknoloji Öğrenci Çalışma Kitabı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.

Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389-407.

Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771-790.

NSTA (1971). National science teachers association position statement on school science education for the’ 70s. The Science Teacher, 38, 46-51.

Özcan, M.B. (2009). Tarihsel yaklaşımın 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimin doğasıyla ilgili görüşlerini geliştirmeye etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.

Poincare, H. (1989). Bilimin Değeri. (Ç. Ed. Yücel, F.), Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.

Roach, L.E., & Wandersee, J.H. (1995). Putting people back into science: using historical vignettes. School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 365-370.

Russell, T.L. (1981). What history of science, how much and why? Science Education, 65(1), 51-64.

Ryan, A.G., & Aikenhead, G.S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.

Sarton, G. (1995). Antik Bilim ve Modern Uygarlık. (Ç. Ed. Dosay, M. & Demir, R.), Gündoğan Yayınları.

Seroglou, F., Koumaras P., & Tselfes, V. (1998). History of science and instructional design: the case of electromegnetism. Science Education, 7(3), 261-280.

Solbes, J., & Traver, M. (2003). Against a negative image of science: history of sicience and the teaching of physics and chemistry. Science Education, 12(7), 703-717.

Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & Mccarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409-421.

Stinner, A. (1994). The Story of force: from Aristotle to Einstein. Physics Education, 29(2), 77-85.

Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79(5), 555-581.

Stinner, A., & Williams, H. (1993). Conceptual change, history, and science stories. Interchange, 24(1-2), 87-103.

Şeker, H., & Welsh, L.C. (2006). The use of history of mechanics in teaching motion and force units. Science Education, 15, 55-89.

Şeker, H. (2012). Bilim tarihini öğretimde kullanma modeli. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(2), 1141-1158.

Topçu, N. (2011). Felsefe. Dergâh Yayınları.

Yıldırım, C. (2014). Bilimin öncüleri. İstanbul: 7 Renk Basım Yayın ve Filmcilik Ltd. Şti.

Yıldız, S. (2013). Lise biyoloji ders kitaplarında bilim tarihi kullanımının incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Wandersee, J.H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: ımplications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 423-434.

Welch, W.W. (1973). Review of the research and evaluation program of Harvard project physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10(4), 365-378.

Wieder, W. (2006). Science as story communicating the nature of science through historical perspectives on science. The American Biology Teacher, 68(4), 200-205.