Original article | Turkish Journal of Teacher Education 2023, Vol. 12(2) 101-113
Tuba Ayik & Nagihan Yildirim
pp. 101 - 113 | Manu. Number: MANU-2309-28-0001.R1
Published online: December 30, 2023 | Number of Views: 39 | Number of Download: 464
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the level of planning and organizing the learning and teaching process, one of the special field competencies of pre-service science teachers in online environments in science courses. A qualitative research approach was used in this study, which tried to determine the special field competencies of the 4th-grade pre-service science teachers of Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Faculty of Education who applied for the Teaching Practice courses online during the pandemic process. In this research, the special case method was used. The "Planning and organizing the learning and teaching process" dimension, one of the special field competencies, was examined through lesson observations, and the data was supported through interviews. The data collection process took place over five months between February and June 2021 and was completed by observing 60 hours of six pre-service science teachers working with two different mentor teachers and an average of 50 minutes of interviews with each of them. As a result of the research, teacher candidates mainly were at A0, A1, and A2 in the dimension of organizing learning environments in line with the curriculum in the teaching process, at A1, A0 proficiency level in the sub-dimension of being able to plan the teaching process by the curriculum, and at A1 proficiency level in the sub-dimension of being able to use materials and resources that support the curriculum in the teaching process has been determined.
Keywords: Pre-Service Science Teacher, Special Field Competencies, Planning and Organizing the Learning and Teaching Process
How to Cite this Article? |
---|
APA 6th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
References |
---|
Aydin, Y. (2010). A study on the field competencies of science and technology teachers: The Case of Rize Province. (Master thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University. Ayvaci, H. S., & Er Nas, S. (2009). Evaluation of teacher guidebooks based on teachers’ views under constructivism learning theory. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 212-225. Babacan, T., & Sasmaz Oren, F. (2015). Determination of the opinions of the prospective teachers with regards to the science special field qualifications. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 4(3), 47-61. Candas, B. (2016). Determination of self-efficacy of science teachers in the context of specific field competencies (Master thesis). Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik University. Cepni, S., Ayas, A., Akdeniz, A., Ozmen, H., Yigit, N., & Ayvaci, H. S. (2005). Kuramdan uygulamaya fen ve teknoloji öğretimi (4rd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. Ergun, M., Yurdatapan, M., & Surmeli, H. (2013). Evaluation of preservice teachers’ opinions about gaining science and technology special area competencies in teacher training programs. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49-66. Fidan, M. (2012). Science and technology teachers' and candidate teachers' perceptions concerning their competecies in their subject speacialist area (Master thesis). Kırşehir: Ahi Evran University. Hu, P.J., Clark, T.H.K., & Ma, W.W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241. Isik, A., Çiltas, A., & Bas, F. (2010). Teacher training and teaching profession. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 14 (1), 53-62. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2825/38165 Karabacak, N., Kucuk, M. & Korkmaz, I. (2015). Primary school teachers’ professional values from the perspective of teaching experts . Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 4(2), 66-100. https://tujted.com/ Karabacak, N., Kucuk, M. & Korkmaz, I. (2018). An investigation of elementary school teacher undergraduate curriculum related to professional value. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 7(1), 61-75. https://tujted.com/ Karatas, K. (2020). A theoretical view of the teaching profession. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 9(17), 39-56. Koroglu, M., & Sivaci, S. (2017). Analyzing the relationship between learning styles and specific field competencies of prospective teachers. Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal (KEFAD), 18(1), 471-483. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/issue/59268/851448 Kucuk, M. & Sevim, S. (2022). Scientific research methods in education. Ankara: Nobel Academical Publishing. Kukut, M. (2021). Adoption of innovative learning-teaching practices in higher education institutions: Problems and solutions (Master thesis). İstanbul: Marmara University. Kurnaz, S. (2019). Comparison of science literacy and field knowledge competences of prospective science teachers: The case of SDU-MAKU. (Master thesis). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel University Metin, M., & Ozmen, H. (2009). Difficulties of pre-service teachers in developing and implementing teaching activities based on 5e model in constructivist approach. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 94-123. MNE [Ministry of National Education] (2019). Teaching practice observation form. Ankara: General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development. MNE [Ministry of National Education] (2008). Teaching competencies, general and specific field competencies for the teaching profession. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publications. MNE [Ministry of National Education] (2017). Teaching profession, general Competencies. Ankara: General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf Numanoglu, G., & Bayir, Ş. (2009). The opinions of computer teacher trainees on generic teacher competencies. Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal (KEFAD), 10(1), 197-212. Oztürk-Bilgin, R. (2022). A case study on special field qualifications of science teachers (Master thesis). Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdogan University. Ozyurt, Y., Bahar, M., & Nartgun, Z. (2017). Level of correspondance between learning outcomes of courses in science teacher education and special field competencies. Abant İzzet Baysal Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(4), 2096-2116. Saritas, M. (2007). Evaluation of the opinions about the benefits of the application of experience to the teacher candidates. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 20(1), 121-143. Sigri, U. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Publishing. Sungur Gul, K., & Ozer Ozkan, Y. (2013). The determination of science and technology special subject standard by prospective teachers views. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 867-881. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/issue/24231/256860 TEDP [Temel Eğitime Destek Projesi]. Öğretmen eğitimi bileşeni. (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Ankara: Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/13161921_YYretmenlik_MesleYi_Genel__YETERLYKLERi_onaylanan.pdf Tekbiyik, A., & Akdeniz, A.R. (2008). Teachers’ views about adoption and application of primary science and technology curriculum. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 23-37. Tugluk, M. N., & Kurtmen, S. (2018). Competencies of teaching profession in Turkey. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 30, 809-841. https://dx.doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.480236 Ucar, M. (1998). Evaluation of teacher views on using teaching materials in elemantary education (Master thesis). Afyon: Kocatepe University Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seckin Publishing. |