Original article | Turkish Journal of Teacher Education 2021, Vol. 10(1) 54-69
Shimeles Assefa, Temesgen Fereja, Teshome Tola Komo, Abraha Asfaw, Girma Zewdie, Hailemariam Kekeba, Desalegn Fufa, Habtamu Wodaj
pp. 54 - 69 | Manu. Number: MANU-2104-15-0004.R1
Published online: June 30, 2021 | Number of Views: 198 | Number of Download: 801
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of teachers' working conditions at primary and secondary schools levels in Ethiopia. The study involved 688 teachers at primary and secondary schools. Teachers' perception of the status of their working conditions was assessed using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. While the quantitative data were analyzed using independent sample-test and one-way ANOVA statistics, the qualitative data were analyzed thematically and used to substantiate and triangulate the quantitative analysis results. The results reveal that school teachers did not take any position on the overall status of their working conditions and preferred neutral positions. Although the teachers showed neutrality regarding the status of their working conditions, the qualitative results suggested that they tend to have negative perceptions towards their working conditions. The majority of the teachers at the sample primary and secondary schools indicated that they were not satisfied with their incomes and benefits. Similarly, the qualitative data shows that they had dissatisfaction with these variables. In terms of teachers' perception of working conditions, the result from one-way ANOVA analysis shows the significant mean difference among regional states for primary schools but no significant difference for counterpart secondary schools. This would mean that secondary school teachers were not satisfied with the income and benefits (IB) they earn whereas their primary school counterparts did not take any position. Concerning gender, in both schools, both male and female teachers preferred neutral positions on the perception of the working condition in the schools. The result from independent sample t-test analysis revealed that primary school female teachers perceived the condition of policy environment, management and evaluation system more positively than male teachers but secondary school male teachers were not satisfied with incomes and benefits than females. It was suggested that school management, regional education bureaus and the Ministry of Education should work jointly towards alleviating difficulties related to income and benefits.
Keywords: Working Condition, Teaching Effectiveness, Quality Education
How to Cite this Article? |
---|
APA 6th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
References |
---|
Adedeji, S. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2011). Fundamentals of teacher education development. Improving the conditions of teachers and teaching in rural schools across African countries. UNESCO: International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa. Addis Ababa. Anberber, M. (1971). A Survey of Social Status of Teachers in Ethiopia. Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Administration, Addis Ababa University. Artz, B. (2010). Fringe benefits and job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 31(6), 636-644. Bakotić, D., & Babić,T. (2013). Relationship between working conditions and job satisfaction: The case of Croatian Shipbuilding Company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2), 206-213. Bennell, P. (2004). Teacher motivation and incentives in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Knowledge and Skills for Development, Brighton. Bennell. P., &Akyeampong, K. (2007). Teacher motivation in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Educational Papers: Department for International Development, Brighton. Berry, B., Smylie, M.,& Fuller, E. (2008). Understanding teacher working conditions: A review and look to the future. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality. CERI (1995). Center for Educational Research and Innovation, Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Gedefaw, K. (2012). Job satisfaction of secondary school teachers in Ethiopia (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). UNISA. Getachew H. (1999). Stress in schoolteachers. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 16(2), 51-81. Leithwood, K., & Mcadie, P. (2010). Teacher working conditions that matter. The Canadian Education Association. Education Canada,47(2), 42-45. Leithwood, K. (2006).Teacher working conditions that matter: Evidence for change. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario. Toronto, Ontario. Lewin, K.M. (2004). The pre-service training of teachers: Does it meet its objectives and how can it be improved? Background paper for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005. Markel, S. (2004). The Condition of TeacherQuality in Arizona: Retrieved 25 Dec, 2016 http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl /AEPI/EPSL-0405-109-AEPI.pdf Mullins, L. J. (2005). Management and organisational behaviour. (7th ed.). London: Prentice-Hall. NCES (1996). National center for education statistics. office of educational research and improvement. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Olango, M., & Semela, T. (2000). Determinants of teachers’ decision to leave or stay in the teaching profession. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 20(1), 1-22. Robbins, S. P. (2005). Essentials of organisational behavior. New Jersey: Pearson. Tesfaye S., & Demewoz, A. (2004). Beginning teacher educations' attitude towards their future profession: The case of DillaCollege of Teacher Education and Health Sciences. TheEthiopianJournal of Education, 24(51-82). Transitional Government of Ethiopia (1994). Education and Training Policy. EEP 86, Addis Ababa. VSO (2002). Whatmakesteacherstick? A PolityResearch Report on Teachers’ Motivation in developing countries. London: Volunteer Services Overseas (VSO). World Bank (2005). Education in Ethiopia: Strengthening the Foundation for Sustainable Progress Washington: World Bank. |