Research article    |    Open Access
Turkish Journal of Teacher Education 2025, Vol. 14(1) 51-68

The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Students’ Scientific Process Skills and Their Attitudes Towards the Course

Serkan Sevim, Irmak Denizhan

pp. 51 - 68

Publish Date: June 30, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

In this study, we examined the effect of the digital storytelling method on 7th-grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes toward the science course within the context of the “Cells and Cell Division” unit. The research was conducted using an action research design, with a sample consisting of gifted students divided into experimental and control groups. With the students in the experimental group, we produced digital stories using Adobe Character Animator software. During this process, students were asked to write scientifically grounded scripts based on the “Cells and Cell Division” topic and design appropriate characters and scenes. Then, they voiced the characters they had created, recorded their dialogues, and used features such as facial expression tracking, motion detection, and lip synchronization offered by the software to generate their digital stories. In contrast, the students in the control group were taught the same topic using traditional, teacher-centered instructional methods, based on the content and learning outcomes specified in the Ministry of National Education’s curriculum. At the end of the implementation, the “Scientific Process Skills Test” and the “Science Attitude Scale” were administered to determine the impact of the intervention. Our research findings revealed that the digital storytelling method had a statistically significant and positive effect on both the students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes toward science. Post-test scores of students in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of their peers in the control group. Effect size values were calculated to be high for both variables, providing quantitative support for the substantial impact of digital storytelling on learning outcomes. Throughout the digital storytelling process, we observed that students actively participated in tasks such as scriptwriting, character design, voice acting, and animation, acting as content creators.

Keywords: Digital Storytelling, Science Education, Cells and Cell Division, Technology Use in Education, Scientific Process Skills


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Sevim, S., & Denizhan, I. (2025). The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Students’ Scientific Process Skills and Their Attitudes Towards the Course. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 51-68.

Harvard
Sevim, S. and Denizhan, I. (2025). The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Students’ Scientific Process Skills and Their Attitudes Towards the Course. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), pp. 51-68.

Chicago 16th edition
Sevim, Serkan and Irmak Denizhan (2025). "The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Students’ Scientific Process Skills and Their Attitudes Towards the Course". Turkish Journal of Teacher Education 14 (1):51-68.

References

    Atılboz, N. G. (2004). High school freshmen’s understanding levels and misconceptions about mitosis and meiosis. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(3).

    Aydoğdu, B., Tatar, N., Yıldız, E., & Buldur, S. (2012). Development of a scientific process skills scale for primary school students. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(3), 292–311.

    Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Durmuş, A. (2016). A study on developing an achievement test: Validity and reliability research of the heat and temperature achievement test. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education, 35(1), 87–102.

    Bilen, K., Hoştut, M., & Büyükcengiz, M. (2019). The effect of digital storytelling method in science education on academic achievement, attitudes, and motivations of secondary school students. Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 1–12.

    Bingol, A., & Halisdemir, N. (2017). Developing an academic achievement test for university students on basic information technologies course. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 54, 541–554.

    Bozkurt, O., & Aydogdu, M. (2009). A comparison of the effects of instruction based on the Dunn and Dunn learning style model and traditional teaching methods on 6th grade science students’ academic achievement levels and attitudes. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 1–14.

    Buyukozturk, S., Cokluk, O., & Koklu, N. (2019). Statistics for social sciences (Revised edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.

    Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Demirel, F., & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific research methods (Revised edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.

    Can, A. (2016). Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

    Ersöz, B., & Arıkan, İ. (2024). The effect of digital story use on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis study. Nizip Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 74–84.

    George, D. and Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update, 10th Edition. Pearson, Boston.

    Gülmez Güngörmez, H. & Akgün, A. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersindeki kuvvet ve enerji ünitesine yönelik akademik başarı testi geliştirme çalışması. Diyalektolog Ulusal Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 85-99.

    Güneş, H., & Güneş, T. (2005). Difficulties and reasons for understanding biology topics among primary school students. Kırşehir Faculty of Education Journal, 6(2), 169–175.

    Karabulut, H., Gökçe, H., & Şahbaz, E. (2024). The effect of digital story use in science course on 5th grade students’ critical thinking skills. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 12(2), 278–294.

    Karakoyun, F. (2014). An investigation of prospective teachers’ and primary school students’ views on digital storytelling activities created in an online environment [Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey)].

    Karslı, G., Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Kurt, M. (2019). Achievement test for the 7th grade "Cell and Division" unit in the renewed science curriculum: Validity and reliability. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 7(1), 68–98.

    Kasap, B., & Say, S. (2023). The effect of using digital storytelling in science teaching on students’ attitudes toward science course, digital literacy levels, and critical thinking skills. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 7(1), 84–96.

    Kotluk, N., & Kocakaya, S. (2015). Digital storytelling in the development of 21st century skills: An examination of secondary school students’ views. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 354–363.

    Köse, S., Ayas, A., & Taş, E. (2003). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on misconceptions: Photosynthesis. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2(14), 106–112.

    Malita, L., & Martin, C. (2010). Digital storytelling as web passport to success in the 21st century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3060-3064.

    MEB, Talim ve Terbiye Genel Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2013). Science course curriculum for primary education institutions (Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Ankara: MEB, Talim ve Terbiye Genel Kurulu Başkanlığı.

    MEB, Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science course curriculum].

    Ohler, J. (2008). The semantic web in education. EDUCAUSE quarterly, 31(4), 7-9.

    Pieterse, G., & Quilling, R. (2011). The impact of digital story-telling on trait Emotional Intelligence (EI) amongst adolescents in South Africa–a case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 156-163.

    Robin, B. (2006, March). The educational uses of digital storytelling. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 709-716). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into practice, 47(3), 220-228.

    Robin, B. R. (2016). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Digital education review, (30), 17-29.

    Sevim, S. (2013). An evaluation of micro-teaching practices from the perspective of pre‑service teachers. The Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, (21), 303–313.

    Sevim, S., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2016). The effect of web‑based instruction on the science and technology course. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 7(2), 1–19.

    Sevim, S., & Denizhan, I. (2025). The effect of digital storytelling on Turkish middle school students' academic achievement and 21st century skills. In M. Küçük (Ed.), International research in science education III (pp. 93–130). Eğitim Publishing.

    Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: a comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1, 1-21.

    Sontay, G., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2017). Developing an achievement test for the 5th grade science unit “The mystery of the earth’s crust”. Fen Bilimleri Öğretim Dergisi, 5(1), 62–86.

    Turgut, G., & Kışla, T. (2015). Computer-assisted storytelling method: A literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 97–121.

    Ulum, E., & Ercan Yalman, F. (2020). 7th graders’ experiences in preparing digital stories on science issues. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 2(1), 1-24.

    Uyanık, G. (2023). Misconceptions in science education. In New approaches in mathematics and science education 2023-III (p. 27).

    Yalçın, A., & Büyükcengiz, M. (2017). The effect of digital storytelling method on middle school students’ academic achievement, scientific process skills, and attitudes towards science course (Unpublished master’s thesis). Akdeniz University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Antalya, Turkey.

    Yılmaz, Y., Üstündağ, M. T., & Güneş, E. (2017). Examination of the stages and tools of developing digital stories as instructional materials. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(3), 1621–1640.