Ahmed, A., & Pollitt, A. (2007). Improving the quality of contextualized questions: An experimental investigation of focus. Assessment in Education, 14(2), 201–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478909

Atila, M. E. & Ozeken, O. F. (2015). Examination for transition from primary education to secondary education (TEOG): What do science teachers think about it? Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education, 34(1), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.394383

Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7

Ayvaci, H. S., & Yamacli, S. (2023). Context-based question generation steps; National and international approaches. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 65, 578-614. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1017324

Bellocchi, A., King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Context-based assessment: Creating opportunities for resonance between classroom fields and societal fields. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1304-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1189107

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186

Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Fiorentini, C., Falsini, P., & Stefanelli, F. (2018). The influence of teaching approach on students’ conceptual learning in physics. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02474

Cahyadi, M. V. (2007). Improving teaching and learning in introductory physics. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury]. Christchurch, New Zealand.

Chen, W. C. (2004). An analysis of pupil difficulties in physics in relation to working memory space. [Master’s thesis, University of Glasgow]. Glasgow, UK.

Choi, J. (2021). A case study of Korean-American parents’ practices and perspectives in early childhood education. [Doctoral dissertation, California State University]. Los Angeles, USA.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications.

Cepni, S. (2016). Introduction to research and project studies. Trabzon: Celepler Printing.

De Jong, O. (2008). Context-based chemical education: How to improve it. Chemical Education International, 8(1), 1–7. https://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol8/0801xDeJong.pdf

Degermenci, A. (2009). Improving, applying and ınvestigating new materials based on the context-based learning approach for the unit ‘Waves’ of the 9th Grade. [Unpublished master’s thesis, Karadeniz Technical University]. National Thesis Centre.

Demirbilek, M. & Levent, A. F. (2019). School administrators’ opinions regarding the changes in the transition between grades and examination system in Turkey. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 50, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.586835

Dinc, E., Dere, I. & Koluman, S. (2014). Experiences and viewpoints on the practices of the transition between various schooling levels. Journal of Adiyaman University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(17), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.761

Elmas, R., & Eryilmaz, A. (2015). How to write good quality contextual science questions: criteria and myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(4), 564-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.10135

Faber, M., Unfried, A., Wiebe, E.N., Corn, J. Townsend, L.W. & Collins, T.L. (2013). Student attitudes toward stem: the development of upper elementary school and middle/high school student surveys. In Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA: US.

Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context‐based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185

Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Rodgers, C. (1990). Physics in the primary school: Peer interaction and the understanding of floating and sinking. European journal of Psychology of Education, 459–475. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23422158

Ilhan, N. & Hosgoren, G. (2017). Developing of context based achievement test towards science: acids and bases. Journal of Science Teaching, 5(2), 87-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2581406

Karakaya, F., Arik, S., Cimen, O. & Yilmaz, M. (2019). Examination of middle school teachers’ views about high-stakes tests in Turkey. Amasya Education Journal, 8(2), 352-372. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/887167

Korsacilar, S. & Caliskan, S. (2015). Effects of the context-based teaching and learning stations methods on 9th grade physics course achievement and retention. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.47476

Kurnaz, M. A. (2013). An investigation of physics teachers perceptions of context based physics problems. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(1), 375-390.

Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of learning method contextual teaching learning (CTL) for increasing learning outcomes of entrepreneurship education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 37-46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184198.pdf

Ozcan, O., & Gercek, C. (2015). What are the pre-service physics teachers’ opinions about context based approach in physics lessons?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 892-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.269

Park, J. & Lee, L. (2004). Analyzing cognitive and non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230767

Puspitarini, D., Ramli, M., & Sudarisman, S. (2020). Possibilities of dynamic assessment to enhance students’ understanding on abstract science concepts: a systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 20-28. https://www.doi.org10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042028

Rannikmae, M., Teppo, M., & Holbrook, J. (2010). Popularity and relevance of science education literacy: Using a context-based approach. Science Education International, 21(2), 116-125. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890666.pdf

Sak, M. (2018). Comparing elementary school students' answers to the context-based and traditional questions in the topic of light. [Unpublished master’s thesis, Kocaeli University]. National Thesis Centre. 

Sak, M., & Gurel, D. K. (2019). Comparing elementary school students’ answers to the context-based and traditional questions in the topic of light with developed achievement tests. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 39(2), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.448136

Senyigit, C. (2021). The effect of problem-based learning on pre-service primary school teachers’ conceptual understanding and misconceptions. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 10(1), 50–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1308676.pdf

Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.002

Tekbiyik, A. (2010). Development of course materials integrating context based approach into 5E model in terms of energy unit for 9th grade secondary students. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University]. National Thesis Centre.

Tekbiyik, A., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2010). An investigation on the comparison of context based and traditional physics problems. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 123-140. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/balikesirnef/issue/3370/46522

Tohani, E., & Aulia, I. (2022). Effects of 21st century learning on the development of critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration skills. Journal of Nonformal Education, 8(1), 46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jne.v8i1.33334

Tural, G. (2013). The functioning of context-based physics instruction in higher education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 14(1), 1–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017357

Ulger, B. B., Ar, M. E., & Sarioglu, S. (2022). Examining the questions asked by the science teachers participated in the context-based question writing training in the written exams. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(1), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.804810

Ultay, E. (2017). Examination of context-based problem-solving abilities of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.113

Ultay, N. & Donmez-Usta N. (2016). Investigating prospective teachers’ ability to write context-based problems. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 12(2), 447-463. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eku/issue/26698/280872

Uwizeyimana, D., Yadav, L., Musengimana, T., & Uwamahoro, J. (2018). The impact of teaching approaches on effective physics learning: An investigation conducted in five secondary schools in Rusizi district, Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(2), 4-14. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/rje/article/view/175117

Waddington, D. J. (2005). Context-based learning in science education: A review. Making it relevant: Context based learning of science, 305–321.

Yaman, M., Dervisoglu, S., & Soran, H. (2004). Evaluating the interest of high school students in lessons. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 27, 232-240. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/87815

Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.

Yucel, N., Dinler, N., Turkoglu, H. & Altac, Z. (2018). Introduction to fluid mechanics. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Zorluoglu, L. S., Sahinturk, A. & Bagriyanik, K. E. (2017). Analysis and evaluation of science course curriculum learning outcomes of the year 2013 according to the revised bloom taxonomy. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.267190